The Democracy Research Center (DRC) has studied the programmes of electoral subjects, which, according to various public opinion polls, are likely to cross the 5% electoral threshold and will be part of the next Parliament.
The analysis of the programmes of election subjects is presented according to the order of their
election numbers. The programmes are analyzed in the
prism of protection of human rights and democratic oversight of the security sector agencies. Except for Georgian Dream, all electoral entities
are signatories to the Georgian Charter developed by the President and share the agenda proposed by the Charter. In terms of
the protection of human rights, the cancelation of
the rights-restricting legislation, which was adopted by the Parliament a few months ago, is particularly important in the Georgian Charter; Among them is
the Law on Transparency of Foreign Influence. The Charter also provides
the reform agenda for the law enforcement system, however, the work process
should clearly outline how the functions and duties will be separated between
the security sector and
the law enforcement agencies.
The election programme of the Coalition for Changes (No. 4) does not propose any initiatives different from the provisions of the Charter in terms of human rights. The programme is relatively more detailed regarding reforming the security sector. According to the vision of the coalition, the State Security Service should be abolished. The Counter-Intelligence Department and the Counter-Terrorist Center should be separated from the State Security Service and should be formed into one agency and its head should be elected by the majority of the full composition of the Parliament of Georgia after he is nominated by the Prime Minister. According to the plan of the Coalition for Changes, the Head of the Anti-Corruption Bureau will be elected by the Parliament of Georgia with a qualified majority. The coalition intends to introduce a national police institution, which will be separated from the Ministry of Internal Affairs, and its head will be elected by the Parliament in a double vote. The programme does not specify who in the security sector will have the authority to conduct covert investigative actions and what the scope of these powers will be; Nothing is said about the steps to be taken in the direction of improving the parliamentary oversight of the security sector either, which is a significant challenge.
2.
No. 5
- Unity - National Movement - Beyond sharing the initiatives of the Georgian
Charter, the election programme does not show in detail what exactly this coalition
intends to do in the direction of protection of human rights. The party's
programme contains several social promises that can be seen as an effort to
improve human rights. For example, the programme provides for the monthly
assistance for newborns, although the amount of assistance is not specified. It
also provides for school meals, although it is not specified by what model this
project will be implemented. National Movement promises students the
construction of a dormitory and subsidies for the apartment rents, which is a
positive initiative in the absence of a housing policy, however, the programme
does not elaborate on the scale of the dormitory or approximately how much the State
will spend on the dormitory and subsidies for the students' apartment rents.
The programme of the National Movement does not show a detailed vision
regarding reforming the security sector. As a signatory entity of the Georgian
Charter, the coalition probably shares the general notes in the Charter about
the need to reform the security sector, although the programme does not allow
us to understand the specific and detailed vision of the party on this issue.
3.
No. 9
- Coalition - Strong Georgia - The programme of the coalition contains positive
initiatives to improve the rights of ethnic minorities, women's rights, and the
rights situation of persons with disabilities. In addition, the coalition
programme provides for the restoration of the National Security Council with
constitutional status. The coalition aims to improve parliamentary and civil
control of the defence and security sector. According to the coalition's plan,
a commission will be created in the Parliament of Georgia to develop political instructions
for the National Security Council and the Ministry of Defence for the
development of conceptual documents of the national level. The programme aims
to deprive the State Security Service of its right to combat, detect and
prevent corruption. Instead, an independent state body equipped with an
investigative function - the National Anti-Corruption Agency - will be created,
which will be accountable to the Parliament and its decisions will be made
public. The coalition programme does not specify who in the security sector
will have the authority to conduct covert investigative actions and what those
powers will be. However, the programme states that it is necessary to
depoliticize and reorganize the Security Service. The plan of the coalition
also implies the abolition of the Trust Group, the creation of the national
bureau of independent investigation and the increase of the role of
non-governmental organizations in the control of the Ministry of Internal
Affairs. In order to strengthen parliamentary oversight, the coalition plans to
allow the postponement of the hearing of the agency's reports in the Parliament
only once, for a specified period, and to define the obligation of presenting
the reports by the head of agency. The programme also provides for the division
of the Parliamentary Defense and Security Committee into two committees - the
Committee of Defense and the Committee of Power Structures.
4.
No. 25
- Gakharia for Georgia - According to the party's programme, protection of
human rights will be the main principle of the state policy, which will be
considered in all spheres of the state activities, and the protection of not
only civil, but also socio-economic rights will be a priority. The party's
programme includes a detailed plan for the protection of human rights. The
programme is an extensive and detailed document from the point of view of
socio-economic rights, with important positive initiatives. In terms of
security sector reforms, the party's initiative is to separate the
Anti-Corruption Department from the State Security Service and to make it part
of the Anti-Corruption Bureau, as well
as to deprive the State Security Service of its mandate to investigate
corruption crimes. According to the programme, it is necessary to establish a
politically neutral professional service protected from career fluctuations in
the security sector. However, no legal or practical guarantees of this
neutrality are specified in the programme. It is not specified either who in
the security sector will have the authority to conduct covert investigative
actions and what the scope of these powers will be. The police reform programme
focuses on the separation of functions, both within the system and between
investigators and prosecutors. The programme also aims to raise the
qualifications of investigators, ensure the independence of investigators, and
introduce the institution of the law and order officer. According to the
party's vision, the Prosecutor General, the Head of the Security Service, the
Head of the Special Investigation Service, the Head of the Personal Data
Protection Service, the Chairman and members of the Central Election
Commission, judges of the Supreme Court, members of the Supreme Council of
Justice, the Head of the State Audit Service, the Public Defender and the
President of the National Bank will be elected on the basis of negotiations
between political parties.
5. No. 41 - Georgian Dream – The election programme of the party has not been released in a material form. Even the electronic programme is not available on the party's official website. During the public oral presentation of the programme, no attention was paid to human rights. The main pre-election promises and slogans of the authorities, which had been voiced for a long time before the oral presentation of the election programme through various news channels, completely missed the standards of human rights protection. The authorities call opponents criminals without any evidence, and in addition, call them LGBT propagandists and warmongers. Banning opposition parties by law and declaring them unconstitutional is the main theme of the pre-election campaign of Georgian Dream, therefore, promises about human rights and democratic reforms would be unconvincing in this context. However, the ruling party did not even try to make such promises in the pre-election campaign, at least symbolically.
The victory of the Georgian Dream ruling party with 53.93% has turned out to be acceptable and promising for the de facto government of Abkhazia.
The second edition of the “Candidacy Check” 2024 provides a detailed description of the expectations regarding the steps to be taken in the nine directions defined by the EU.
Based on the study and analysis of hundreds of messages received from observers about election violations, we would like to present information about the election fraud scheme.