On February 5,
Georgian Dream leader Mamuka Mdinaradze announced the adoption of new
repressive legislation. The Democracy Research Center considers that, with the announced amendments, the party is trying not only to
restrict, but also to completely eliminate dissenting and critical opinion in
the country. The announced legislative changes, which are directed against independent media and civil society organizations, disregard the Constitution of Georgia and
international standards.
Georgian Dream
is trying every day to eliminate free and pro-European institutions, the activities of which, through the
dissemination of real information and critical opinion, are related to the
development of democratic processes.
The European
Court of Human Rights has referred
to the issues of restriction
of freedom of expression in a number of its judgements,
indicating that the right to freedom of speech and
expression includes, among other things, publication/dissemination of materials that may be unacceptable
to any party, especially if
there is a high public interest in the issue. Restrictions on this right are
permissible only in extreme cases, when there is a legitimate aim.
The grave draft laws
announced by Georgian
Dream contradict the standards set by the United Nations, the OSCE and the
Council of Europe, according to which,
disproportionate restrictions on the right to freedom of speech and expression and the
imposition of censorship are inadmissible. The
announced draft laws are another step towards establishment
of a
dictatorship.
The decision taken by the state in relation to Azerbaijani journalist constitutes a grave violation of human rights, including breaches of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights.
Russia continues to pursue deliberate efforts aimed at the annexation of Georgia’s occupied territories with soft power instruments.
The Anti-Corruption Bureau was established in 2022 in response to recommendations issued by the European Commission, which called for strengthening the independence and functional capacity of anti-corruption institutions.